Friday, November 23, 2007

2 Portfolio Additions: San Gold and E-House At the Market Price for Friday, Nov. 23rd

I will add 3000 shares of San Gold at the opening price in Canada today. The Canadian company is an attractive producer with exploration blue sky. The shares trade on the Venture exchange under the ticker SGR, as well as on the OTC under SGRCF.

I will also add 100 shares of E-House (China) Holdings Limited (EJ: NYSE). E-House owns China's real estate multi-listing service, a tremendous asset for leveraging it's overall release services offering. The shares went public in an IPO earlier this year and have witnessed a massive correction in the last few weeks. The fall is excessive. The shares may keep falling, but establishing an initial position of 100 shares for now is perfectly acceptable -- falling knife be dammed. I believe there's a very good chance the stock will bounce this Friday and we just hit the low. But if I'm wrong, I will dollar cost average at a later date.

The next update will include detailed profiles.

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Portfolio Additions And Summary

Today, a flock of new positions will be added to the Investor Intelligentsia $200,000 model portfolio. On the open, the following positions will be established at market price:
  1. China Mobile (CHL:NYSE): 120 shares
  2. China Life (LFC:NYSE): 120 shares
  3. National Oilwell Varco (NOV: NYSE): 150 shares
  4. EnCana Corp.: (ECA:NYSE) 100 shares
  5. Devon Energy (DVN: NYSE): 80 shares
  6. ABB Ltd. (ABB: NYSE): 200 shares
  7. Diana Shipping (DSX: NYSE): 200 shares
  8. CF Industries Holdings (CF: NYSE): 100 shares
  9. Mosaic Co. (MOS: NYSE): 100 shares
  10. Potash Corp. (POT: NYSE): 50 shares
A summary of each company will follow. In addition, the portfolio as of the close of November 19th is summarized in the graphic below.


Portfolio Summary: November 19, 2007 (click to enlarge)


Profile, Disclosure, Compliance and Disclaimer: Click Here

Monday, November 19, 2007

Model Portfolio Update: 2 New Companies

This will be a short update, recording the entry positions established by the first post. Two new positions will be established today at the market open. Later this week, a fundamental review of market conditions will be posted. Stay tuned.

PORTFOLIO ADDITIONS:

  • Carpathian Gold, Inc. (CPN.Vancouver): Buy 4000 shares at market open in Canada and convert price to US$ for portfolio tracking purposes. The company's shares can be traded in the US via the OTC ticker CPNFF.

  • Exmin Resources (EXM.Vancouver): Buy 10,000 shares at market open in Canada and convert price to US$ for portfolio tracking purposes. The company's shares can be traded in the US via the OTC ticker EXMIN.

Carpathian Gold is developing attractive properties in Romania. Investors have widely considered the shares risky due to the problems experienced by fellow Canadian mine developer Gabriel Resources. But it's unfair to paint both companies with the same brush. Carpathian will not use cyanide and to date, there has been no indication from the Romanian government or local constituents that Carpathian's plans are at risk. Gabriel Resources is a high profile situation given the size of the resource and the fact that the NGO community has sought to shut the company down. Gabriel Resources' problems offer an opportunity for investors to buy Carpathian at fire sale prices. Carpathian has established an initial 43-101 Canadian compliant resource estimate for it's Colnic and Rovina projects, showing an indicated 1.82 million ounces of gold equivalent and a total inferred equivalent of 3.69 million ounces. Geologists that have reviewed the property believe the company will be able to prove-up more ounces, perhaps well past five million. But even with back-of-napkin numbers, using 3 million ounces of gold equivalent, the stock trades at a valuation of less than US$37 per ounce of gold. (Assumptions: 147.6 million fully diluted share capital, a stock price of C$0.74 times 1.02 for a US$ $111,408,480 market cap, divided by 3 million ounces). Not all ounces are equal, of course! In Carpathian's case, political risk aside, they have what looks to be low cost, economically viable projects. While one can find Jr. mining companies with lower gold-based valuations, it's quite difficult to find companies with advanced stage resources proven to be both large and highly likely to be economically viable to mine. Were it not for the political situation, Carpathian would easily trade at prices between two and three times the current quote. This provides the patient investor an arbitrage opportunity. Over time, as Carpathian moves past milestones, the shares should advance strongly.

EXMIN Resources: I profiled EXMIN Resources in a previous post. Please see that write-up for more information. The shares have drifted lower once again on the back of tax loss selling and the current quote represents a fantastic entry point for patient investors. The news flow with joint venture partners will be strong over the coming months and the shares will respond, moving higher.



ESTABLISHED POSITIONS SUMMARY

Each order executed as planned. The portfolio now holds the following:

  • 400 Agnico-Eagle Mines shares bought at $50.00
  • 200 Petrobras shares bought at $100
  • 350 Suntech Power Holdings shares bought at $63.75
  • 2000 Pediment Exploration Shares, bought at C$3.07

The Pediment Explorations position will be carried at a cost basis of US$6,311.92. This is derived by multiplying the opening trade on Nov. 15th (C$3.07) by 2000 shares and then multiplying by the Canadian/Dollar exchange rate of 1.028, which was both the high and opening rate of exchange for that day (see chart below).

For each position, a flat rate commission of $10 will be subtracted from cash and added to the cost basis. The Investor Intelligentsia model portfolio will be as close to "real world" as this format permits.

November 15th Canadian/Dollar Exchange Rates (click graphic to enlarge):




Profile, Disclosure, Compliance and Disclaimer: Click Here

Thursday, November 15, 2007

DUBIN MISSIVE: Money Markets Break The Buck; Ben Bernanke Is A Liar - and more....

Greetings friends and compatriots of the "Friends of Eric" list.

This will be another installment of "the newsletter before the newsletter." The muse struck, so here I write.

In this missive:

- Money Market Funds BREAK The Buck
- Ben Bernanke Is A Liar
- Stock Market Action This Week
- The End Game
- Newsletter update: It's coming...



Money Market Funds BREAK The Buck

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Did you catch the whopper about money funds breaking the buck? Here they come... The list of institutions reported in the Bloomberg story below and the actions taken qualify this as a seven sigma event. This has NEVER happened before. The good news is that the total dollar amount is "manageable" (with Helicopter Ben liquidity injections over the next two years papering over this monstrosity and many more soon to come). In fact, this entire credit crisis revolves around a dollar amount that is containable - even if we ultimately exceed the one trillion dollar hurdle. With an identifiable target, the system can be "fixed."

The bad news is that these damn infectious SIVs and problematic asset-backed paper is darn near everywhere and it only takes a small amount of rotten meat to make a whole sausage go bad. I'm not among bears that believe we are headed for a deflationary crash on the back of a collapse in credit. Again, the system and the powers that be face an identifiable threat -- even though the bad paper is spread across a wide swath of the global financial system. The patient can be treated with liquidity - massive amounts of liquidity.

The specific case of money market funds is worth paying extra attention to. I wouldn't be surprised if over 50 funds need capital injections when all is said and done. That could very well shock people. We are already at a precarious place when it comes to
sentiment. Assaults to the perceived sanctity of money market funds could have unpredictable impacts to mass psychology.




Ben Bernanke Is A Liar
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I kind of miss the Alan Greenspan days. Good old Mr. Magoo would testify before Congress and provide such absurd, obfuscations the English lexicon is now blessed with the term "Greenspan Speak." Many of "our" fearless Congressional representatives trembled at the idea of looking stupid in the face of misperceived brilliance from "The Maestro" (just when did Bob Woodward fall from investigative journalistic grace to become a hack insider?). Greenspan had the talent of not lying quite as often as Bernanke. Anytime Grandpa Al wanted to do away with an uncomfortable subject he'd just embark on a circumlocutious obfuscation and no Congressional representative would dare ask just what the heck was said for fear of being seen as an idiot.

Enter Ben Bernanke and his policy of a more "open" Federal Reserve. Last week he testified before Congress that the risks of economic slowdown and rising inflation were balanced. Nothing could be further from the truth. in fact, we're going to have both, and the Fed is powerless to prevent stagflation. We might get lucky and 2008 will prove to be a healthy year for the global economy overall. Generally speaking, I subscribe to the camp that holds this forecast. But the US economy is still going to experience considerable pain. Last week's testimony was in service of supporting the Dollar - attempting to slow down its fall. To some extent, it worked. Gold and oil and cross currencies were due for a breather and the unwinding of the Japanese carrytrade took a particularly nasty turn on Monday, sending hedge funds scurrying to liquidate positions in commodity-based investments and cyclical momentum stocks tied to the thesis of global economic growth.

The Fed and the Treasury are interested in having a slow, orderly decline in the Dollar, not a crash. The theatrics of the last ten days are not surprising. Now, we are right back where we started from and the bias for a slowly declining dollar, and rising oil and gold have returned.

The Fed will most definitely cut rates no later than the next Open Market Committee meeting, regardless of the propaganda floated since the last cut and throughout last week. They have no choice. The systemic risks to the credit system remain as bad as August. They just can't speak of that reality in plain English and all at one time. To do so would facilitate a Dollar crash, and that's not in anyone's interest.


Stock Market Action This Week
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Today was just another day in our schizophrenic market. For every reason a bull can point to for a bottom setting in, there are more "unknowns" that haunt the minds of both bulls and bears -- for the bears know just how bad things could get if the credit system freezes.

Did I tell you I was thinking of getting a dog? No, really. In fact, hanging out with one like this

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Ljrv979j7tw

might help me get into the minds of average fund managers! Agreed?

It's clear a great many traders are itching to get back into financial services companies. On Tuesday, Goldman Sachs reported that they had net negative exposure to troubled release asset backed paper. They've been particularly successful shorting the market. That announcement, combined with reasonably strong sales reported by WalMart sent the market rocketing higher in a broad-based rally. But no one seems to ask the logical question: who's on the other side of those Goldman shorts? Can you say Citigroup and hapless hedge funds? Just because Goldman happens to have a reasonable balance sheet does not necessarily translate into a signal that it's ok to go back into the water. Furthermore, Wallyworld's sales are up precisely because a great many more American's are getting squeezed -- and the fact that the price of food and gas WalMart sells has been on the rise.

Bear Stearns reported this morning their write-offs for the current quarter would be less than expected. That certainly helped carry over yesterday's festive mood. But by the end of the day, the financials had, for the most part, given back all of today's gains. In technology, bellwethers like Apple failed to have profoundly bullish news carry over through today. It was reported that China Mobile will eventually offer Apple's iPhone to a subscriber base in excess of 400 million. That sent Apple back from the depths of a nasty correction yesterday, but follow-through entirely failed today. One could see similar weakness in the action of Google and other sentiment bellwethers among momentum technology stocks. This is anything but healthy, particularly as it comes in the wake of last week's sizable NASDAQ correction. The schizophrenic nature of the market continues.

We can hope that a great deal of the asset write-downs will have been reported within a couple of weeks. New accounting rules coming into effect will help facilitate this process. It's possible that within about two weeks market volatility will calm down for a period of two months, give or take -- until the next cycle of asset write-down reportage begins. Until then, expect continued massive volatility.

The End Game
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Whatever happens, some elements of the end-game are indeed perceivable. Having a healthy allocation to gold, silver and assets that perform well under conditions of high inflation are an absolute necessity in today's world. It just so happens that many hard asset related investments can be justified for reasons above and beyond the credit crisis. For example, a heavy exposure to energy and alternative energy investments is a sound portfolio decision for a variety of reasons beyond the scope of this particular letter.

This credit crisis will be fixed with liquidity injections AND DIRECT MONETIZATION of troubled assets by the Federal Reserve accepting them as collateral for loans that will, in the long run, be forgiven. We will also likely see some bastard clone of the Resolution Trust Corporation created ala the "Savings and Loans Crisis." As this creature eats bad paper, aggregate national debt will rise on the back of a taxpayer subsidized bailout. The latter might not necessarily be a terrible thing if these problematic securities were sold at reasonable prices ($0.20 on the dollar, anyone?). But instead, bureaucrats will serve their masters and the system and the average price paid for damaged goods will likely be above $0.80 on the dollar, hosing the tax payer. Check back with me in two years.

Maybe we'll be lucky and "our" representatives will come up with one of those cute government program names. "SIV Condom Corporation?" "ADR Act"? (aka "The American Dream Restoration Act of 2008"). Don't ask me. Naming the thing is well beyond my paygrade. Have no fear. Treasury Secretary Paulsen will be on the case. Americans will have a nice sounding name to cheer and salute as the inflation tax sneaks up and bites us in the ass.

Vacuum-cleaning up the bad paper along the lines of an ADR Act will most certainly infuse liquidity into the system. But that infusion is tied to the creation of more debt and is similar in character to much of our day to day system activities anyway. Dealing with the crisis by direct monetization, however, is an entirely different animal - so much so that most people don't think it would dare be attempted. But don't scoff. Back in August, in news reports that didn't receive much analysis, it was noted that the Fed accepted as collateral realestate asset backed paper for liquidity injections. The media reported that this was the first time in history that action was taken. No one in the financial press has bothered to go back to the Fed to see what happened to that collateral. While I can't prove this at this time, I believe the odds are high that collateral was flushed down the toilet, and that the Fed never had any intention of attempting to collect on this particular short-term lending. That was a moderate case of direct monetization, exactly as Ben Bernanke described as being necessary from time to time in his famous speech about how to prevent another Great Depression - helicopter money.

Are you ready to pay nearly $5 for a loaf of bread? In two or three years, that's going to happen -- and I'm talking about bland mass produced bread, not the fine artisan loafs we've got around San Francisco fetching near $4 already.

Newsletter update: It's coming...
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
My money management activities have been quite time consuming. Staying ahead of intense volatility hasn't left me with enough free time to finish newsletter infrastructure development. But I hope to have a skeleton operation up and running by the end of the month. Anyone on the "Friends of Eric" list will be alerted to the formal launch of the letter - and if you got this email directly from me, you're on the "FOE" list :-)

With Thanksgiving soon approaching, I'd like to wish you all a wonderful holiday should I not have the opportunity to speak directly with you in the days ahead. Through all the turmoil, we have much to be thankful for. I'm certainly looking forward to a few extra days of downtime for reflection and for catching up on newsletter infrastructure!

Best investing to you,

Eric Dubin

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Bank of America, Legg Mason Prop Up Their Money Funds (Update6)

By Shannon D. Harrington and Christopher Condon

Nov. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Bank of America Corp., Legg Mason Inc. and at least two other companies are propping up their money-market funds to cushion them against possible losses on debt issued by structured investment vehicles.

Bank of America, the nation's second-largest bank, may provide as much as $600 million to funds that bought debt from SIVs, Chief Financial Officer Joe Price said at an investor conference today.

Legg Mason, SEI Investments Co. and SunTrust Banks Inc. have stepped in to make sure their funds don't fall below the $1 a share net asset value, known as ``breaking the buck.'' The 10 largest managers of U.S. money funds have about $50 billion in short term debt of SIVs, some of which has defaulted.

``This is the first real case'' of securities held by money-market funds defaulting, said Peter Crane, founder of Crane Data LLC, the Westborough, Massachusetts-based publisher of the Money Fund Intelligence Newsletter.

For "FAIR USE" ONLY

FULL STORY:

$200,000 Model Portfolio Launch

Starting today, Investor Intelligentsia will manage a US$200,000 model portfolio. Portfolio selections will have a bias towards investments in the natural resource sectors, including exposure to oil and gas, precious and base metals, agriculture, water and technology companies that help these resource industries thrive. In addition, extensive coverage of international markets, infrastructure, technology and alternative energy industries will be profiled. There will be no specific restrictions on the type of investments and investment methodologies employed. All portfolio constituents will be publicly traded securities.

The following orders are now "live" and in place before the market open:

  1. Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. (AEM.NYSE): Buy 400 shares at a limit price of $50, good until canceled.
  2. Petroleo Brasileiro - aka "Petrobras" (PBR.NYSE): Buy 200 shares at a limit price of $100, good until canceld
  3. Suntech Power Holdings Co. Ltd. (STP.NYSE): Buy 350 shares at a limit price of $63.75, good until canceled
  4. Pediment Exploration LTD (PEZ.V): Buy 2000 shares at the open in Canada, and convert basis price to US Dollars for tracking purposes; OTC shares trade in the US under the ticker PEZFF

Agnico-Eagle is a fabulous company. We profiled them in an earlier message when they were trading in the $30s. With the rise in gold and our expectation that 2008 will see gold trading in four digit price territory, Agnico-Eagle remains an attractive core holding for exposure to gold. They are a midtier producer with sufficient size to be attractive to institutional investors. But unlike larger gold companies suffering from questionable ability to grow reserves, Agnico-Eagle will be bringing new mines into production in the coming years, and management has proven to be effective at keeping costs low - not easy in the current mining environment, what with rising energy costs and shortages of key resources ranging from skilled engineers to equipment. Earlier comments on Agnico-Eagle can be read here.

Petrobras is the national oil and gas company of Brazil. By any metric, it ranks among the largest oil companies in the world. However, not all oil majors have rapidly expanding reserves. In fact, it's not well appreciated by average investors that companies like Exxon, Shell and BP face tremendous challenges increasing their reserve life indices. The more well known publicly traded majors also have production sharing agreements with host countries that have percentage royalties that escalate as the price of crude rises. In specific cases, it actually is in the interest of these companies to see LOWER oil prices! As a state-sponsored entity with the majority of its assets in Brazil, Petrobras does not face quite as many onerous production sharing agreements. The company also has a number of stellar attributes, including an extensive deep water drilling technology and highly prospective regions for exploration off the coast of Brazil. Recently, the company announced the discovery of a light grade oil field estimated to hold between four and eight billion barrels. This news set the NYSE ADR shares soring to just under the $120 mark, only to see the fall just as rapidly as oil prices corrected toward $90 WTI on a cash basis. There will be more discoveries announced in the months and years ahead. The basis Petrobras is exploring is one of the last regions on earth where new large fields are likely to be found. The shares are a compelling value for long-term energy bulls and simultaneously offer diversification away from US-based political risk. Unfortunately, there is likely more political risk holding a company like Exxon than Petrobras.

Suntech Power is the largest Chinese manufacturer of solar panels. They have the scale economies, industry relationships and technology to remain a player for well into the next decade. In this booming industry, that's not a trivial consideration. They are not technology leaders in specific applications such as "thin film" panels, but their product breadth and manufacturing economies have earned them growing market share. They have long-term contracts with silicon suppliers, and they have invested in integrated solar products (solar cell technology developed as part of actual building materials such as roof shingles). Suntech represents the best value among solar companies. Even though the shares have witness a significant move and both trailing and forward price-to-earnings ratios are not cheap, the shares are still attractively valued relative to the explosive earnings growth the company should generate. Other companies like SunPower and First Solar are attractive, but their valuations are nestled around the flight paths of migratory birds. We will review and consider other solar companies in the future. For now, a clear investment case can be made for SunTech

Pediment Exploration: Mark Twain once quipped, a mine was nothing more than "a hole in the ground owned by a liar." The mining industry has come a long way since the 1800s, but the sad fact is that the vast majority of exploration companies never graduate to the stage of mine developers or take-out candidates. Pediment is likely on the way to proving the exception to this rule. They have multiple projects in Mexico and more than one chance of bringing a mine operation into production. Throughout the summer, Pediment reported outstanding drill results at its San Antonio gold project in Baja, California. Results including a drill hole with 1.64 grams per tone gold over 152 meters. There's no doubt they have found an economically minable resource. It's just a question of how big it will be. Gary Freeman, President & CEO, beams when he describes the project in an interview with Al Korelin and Jay Taylor. But Pediment isn't a one trick pony. The company recently announced the purchase of "La Colorada," a gold and silver property in Sonora State, Mexico. It was a high grade underground mine in the 1800s that was shut down following the Mexican Revolution. Eldorado gold re-worked the mine between 1993 and 2000 but low gold prices halted that effort. Eldorado estimated another 450,000 ounces remained (estimate not in compliance with modern Canadian standards), and Pediment's management believes much more gold can be proved-up. They now control an option to acquire a 100% interest in the project, including infrastructure and a processing plant, by investing $1.1 million initially, and another $1.8 over the course of two years. This is a relatively low risk exploration and re-development operation that has a high probability of delivering high value cash flow and low costs. Excitement surrounding the San Antonio project pushed the shares well into the C$1 to C$2 and change range. Today, Pediment is bouncing at about C$3 and attempting to move higher. As investors come to appreciate development work at "La Colorada" and other projects in the Pediment stable, the shares should perform strongly.


Profile, Disclosure, Compliance and Disclaimer: Click Here

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Profile, Disclosure, Compliance and Disclaimer!

Investor Intelligentsia provides financial market commentary drawn upon a wide variety of disciplines. Eric Dubin serves as executive editor. Mr. Dubin is an independent buy-side analyst and portfolio manager based in San Francisco, California. He managed the "Tech Stalker" "Strategy Lab" portfolio for MSN Money for over two years, and served as the lead communications and end markets analyst and managing editor for INFRASTRUCTURE, the first technology-focused financial securities letter published on the internet. He can be reached by sending an email to "Eric" at the internet domain InvestorIntelligentsia.com ("eric" and the domain name are separated here to prevent automated spam email address harvesting - just combine the two when addressing).


FULL DISCLOSURE AND COMPLIANCE:

If a security is profiled for inclusion or removal within a portfolio hosted by Investor Intelligentsia, neither Investor Intelligentsia nor its principals will trade said security during the three days prior to the date of profile publication, nor during the three days following date of profile publication. This compliance rule will also apply to securities that happen to be the "substantive" focus of Investor Intelligentsia articles or research reports published herein, where "substantive" is defined as going beyond the mere reporting of events in the financial markets during any given week where specific securities are mentioned in said reportage. Following the passage of the three-day rule, it should be assumed that securities held within Investor Intelligentsia model portfolios or mentioned favorably by Investor Intelligentsia or its principals may be held by Investor Intelligentsia principals.

Neither Investor Intelligentsia nor its principals accept any form of remuneration from companies that happen to be profiled or discussed. Investor Intelligentsia welcomes information packages from private and publicly traded companies, AND NOTHING MORE.


DISCLAIMER:

Neither Investor Intelligentsia nor its principals are registered as a securities broker-dealer or investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange commission or any state securities regulatory authority. Investor Intelligentsia is published in according with the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act") provided for in Section 202(a)(11)(D). This exemption is available for the publisher of any "bona fide financial publication of general and regular circulation." Neither Investor Intelligentsia nor its principals are responsible for trades executed by readers and/or subscribers to Investor Intelligentsia and affiliated services. Information contained therein do not represent individual investment advice nor a recommendation to buy or sell securities or any financial instrument, nor to serve as an endorsement of any security or investment. Because individual investment objectives vary, neither Investor Intelligentsia nor its principals can be seen as providing investment advice. The appropriateness of any given investment can only be determined by the individual, in consultation with his or her financial, legal and tax advisors. Any action taken as a result of reading Investor Intelligentsia is solely the responsibility of the reader. Investor Intelligentsia nor its principals do not profess to be a professional investment advisors, and strongly encourages all readers to consult with their legal, tax and financial advisors before making any investment decision. Furthermore, material presented at Investor Intelligentsia does not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or individualized investment advice.

All data and information contained or referenced at Investor intelligentsia has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but there is no guarantee as to completeness or accuracy. Any opinions expressed herein are statements of our judgment as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice.

Neither Investor Intelligentsia nor its principals make any representations as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility therefore. Third party statements contained herein and information contained in any source cited herein are not endorsed by or adopted by Investor Intelligentsia unless otherwise noted.

Information in foregoing discussions contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act"). In particular, when used in the preceding discussion, the words "plan," "confident that," "believe," "scheduled," "expect," or "intend to," and similar conditional expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements subject to the safe harbor created by the Act. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties and actual results could differ materially from those expressed in any of the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, future events and the financial performance of companies profiled which are inherently uncertain and actual events and/or results may differ materially.